Judges' Reasoning in Vasectomy-Induced Divorce Cases

Authors

  • Adim Ranun UIN Imam Bonjol padang
  • Yusnita Eva UIN Imam Bonjol padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52496/mjhki.v2i2.64

Keywords:

Divorce, Judge's Consideration, Vasectomy

Abstract

Vasectomy or vas ligation is a male contraceptive method that involves cutting and ligating the right and left vas deferens to prevent the release of sperm during ejaculation. Vasectomy family planning also aims to change people's thinking about the value and number of children. This research method is library research, where books, journals, laws, and other scientific works relevant to the writing are used as references. The approach used in this research is a historical approach, which is carried out by examining the background and historical development of the legal issues at hand. The focus of this research is the judge's consideration of divorce cases triggered by vasectomy, as happened in the decision of the Simalungun Religious Court Number 266/Pdt.G/2013/PA.Sim. In the verdict, a dispute between husband and wife triggered by a vasectomy is recognized as a valid basis for granting permission for divorce. This reflects the importance of proper education and socialization regarding vasectomy that is not communicated can have an impact on the marriage, making the wife feel that she does not get satisfaction, enjoyment during sexual activity and the impact, among others, not having offspring. If a divorce occurs after a vasectomy, and then remarries, the subsequent marriage will have an impact on the couple who want offspring.

Author Biographies

Adim Ranun, UIN Imam Bonjol padang

UIN Imam Bonjol padang  

Yusnita Eva, UIN Imam Bonjol padang

UIN Imam Bonjol padang  

References

Asdin, Apriana. “Dampak Keluarga Berencana (KB) Terhadap Permasalahan Penduduk Dan Hukumnya” 3, no. 2 (2024): 105–6.

Asiah, Hj. Nur. “MASLAHAH MENURUT KONSEP IMAM AL GHAZALI,” n.d., 1–17.

Azhari, Sevi Sukri, and Mustapa. “Konsep Pend Islam Menurut Al Ghazali.” Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran 4 (2021): 271–78.

Borotan, Amrin. “Studi Komparatif Pemikiran Ibnu Hazm Dan Imam Al-Ghazali Tentang ‘Azl Sebagai Metode Kontrasepsi Dan Relevansinya Dengan Program Keluarga Berencana (Kb) Di Indonesia.” Islam 3, no. 2 (2020): 1–24.

Cahyani, Dwi Ayu. “Dukungan Sosial Dalam Melakukan Vasektomi Di Kecamatan Tanggulangin Kabupaten Sidoarjo.” Jurnal Biometrika Dan Kependudukan 6, no. 2 (2018): 171. https://doi.org/10.20473/jbk.v6i2.2017.171-179.

Dartiningsih, Bani Eka. “Komunikasi Kesehatan Tinjauan Praktis Vasektomi Di Madura,” 2018, 53–54.

Dwintasari, Pande Putri, and Ketut Hari Mulyawan. “Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Partisipasi Pria Dalam Penggunaan Metode Kontrasepsi Vasektomi Di Kecamatan Payangan Kabupaten Gianyar.” Archive of Community Health 4, no. 1 (2019): 62. https://doi.org/10.24843/ach.2017.v04.i01.p08.

Hanasir, Muh Nasrul, Universitas Islam, and Negeri Alauddin. “PENGGUNAAN KONTRASEPSI VASEKTOMI DALAM PANDANGAN HUKUM.” 2 1 (2020): 60–71.

Harahap, Solehuddin. “Hukum Vasektomi Dan Tubektomi Dalam Pernikahan.” Jurnal Ilmu Kebidanan Dan Kesehatan (Journal of Midwifery Science and Health) 01 (2017): 1–10.

Hasibuan, Mahmudin, Akhir Saleh Pulungan, Nur Hakima Akhirani Nasution, and Mhd Romadhoni. “Keluarga Berencana (Kb) Dalam Perspektif Maqashid Syariah.” Mushaf Journal : Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis 4, no. 1 (2024): 86–95.

M. Nur, Yulia, Yade Kurnia Sari, and Dewi Harwita. “Pengaruh Pendidikan Kesehatan Kontrasepsi Pria Terhadap Motivasi Pria PUS Menjadi Akseptor KB Vasektomi.” Jurnal Akademika Baiturrahim Jambi 12, no. 1 (2023): 30. https://doi.org/10.36565/jab.v12i1.578.

Mashudi, Mashudi. “Kontribusi Metode Istiqra’ Dalam Program Vasektomi (Mop).” Iqtisad 4, no. 2 (2017): 49–72. https://doi.org/10.31942/iq.v4i2.2629.

Pertiwi, Tanza Dona, and Sri Herianingrum. “Menggali Konsep Maqashid Syariah: Perspektif Pemikiran Tokoh Islam.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam 10, no. 1 (2024): 807. https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v10i1.12386.

Rizkitama, Afnita Ayu, and Fitri Indrawanti. “Hubungan Pengetahuan, Persepsi, Sosial Budaya Dengan Peran Aktif Pria Dalam Vasektomi Di Kecamatan Paguyangan Kabupaten Brebes Tahun 2011-2012.” Unnes Journal of Public Health 4, no. 1 (2015): 48–54.

Rosalina, Shelly. “Gambaran Faktor Predisposing, Enabling Dan Reinforcing Kb Vasektomi.” Jurnal PROMKES 7, no. 1 (2019): 113. https://doi.org/10.20473/jpk.v7.i1.2019.113-123.

Salamun, and Wita Yulianti. “Analisa Tingkat Keharmonisan Suami Istri Pengguna Vasektomi Dengan Algoritma C4.5.” Jurnal Buana Informatika 9, no. 2 (2018): 81. https://doi.org/10.24002/jbi.v9i2.1655.

Selfi Wahyu Putri, Ramdan Fawzi, and Muhammad Yunus. “Analisis Hukum Islam Terhadap Perubahan Fatwa Mui Tahun 1979,2009,2012 Tentang Penggunaan Alat Kontrasepsi Vasektomi.” Jurnal Riset Hukum Keluarga Islam 1, no. 2 (2022): 83–88. https://doi.org/10.29313/jrhki.v1i2.577.

Sulha, and Fenti Dewi Pertiwi. “Gambaran Pemilihan Kontrasepsi Vasektomi Pada Pasangan Usia Subur Di Kecamatan Bogor Selatan Tahun 2019.” Promotor 4, no. 2 (2021): 184–91. https://doi.org/10.32832/pro.v4i2.5585.

Syarif, Muhammad, and Furqan Furqan. “Maqashid Al-Syariah Kesepakatan Pasangan Suami Isteri Tidak Memiliki Anak (Childfree) Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Al-Ijtimaiyyah 9, no. 1 (2023): 51. https://doi.org/10.22373/al-ijtimaiyyah.v9i1.17545.

Utami, Tri. “Pengalaman Menggunakan Alat Kontrasepsi Mantap (Vasektomi) Di Kecamatan Wanasaba Kabupaten Lombok Timur.” Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan Bhakti Husada: Health Sciences Journal 9, no. 2 (2018): 55–65. https://doi.org/10.34305/jikbh.v9i2.69.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-20

How to Cite

Ranun, Adim, and Yusnita Eva. 2024. “Judges’ Reasoning in Vasectomy-Induced Divorce Cases”. Mawaddah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 2 (2):211-28. https://doi.org/10.52496/mjhki.v2i2.64.

Issue

Section

Artikel