Review Guidelines

General

1. Give comments on the incorrect parts/ need changes
2. Comment on the right side of the incorrect parts/need changes

Detail

1. Title: Effectivity, Spesification, and Clarity
2. Abstract: Describe the essence of the article
3. Keywords: Define the field, topic, research issue, that are covered by article
4. Pendahuluan: Up-to-date, Originality, Topic Relevance, Compatibility, important reason of the research object
5. Research Method: Must emphasize on the procedure and data analysis for empirical study.
6. Results and Discussion: recent finding, relevance with the related researchers., and scientific contribution from finding/ idea for development of practice and knowledge.
7. Conclusion: Logical, Valid, Brief and Clear.
8. Suggestion: For practical treatment, development of new theory, and further research
9. Picture/Table: In the centre position, uncropped, good quality to see, Picture/ Table Title is written with capital.
10. References: recent and newest reference from book/ journal. Rule: 80% of the references are from related journal at least in the last 15 years publication and minimum 10 references; minimum 80% in form of text.

Complete Manuscript Review Process

1. Writing: Is the manuscript easy to follow? Does it have logical development and clear organization?
2. Is the manuscript easy to understand?
3. Pay attention to the big problem with mechanic, grammar, spelling, and punctuation? (If there are only small mistakes, give notes in the incorrect parts to inform writers. If there are consistent mistakes in almost all parts, just choose one or two as examples: do not edit all parts
4. Abbreviation: Must be used wisely so that the reader do not feel difficult to remember what is represented by the abbreviation.
5. Follow the style, format and other journal rule.
6. Citation must be provided to give information-based evidence from outer source.

Decision Making

• Accept Submission
• Revision Required
• Resubmit for Review
• Resubmit Elsewhere
• Decline Submission