Qiwāmah And Epistemic Violence: A Critical Socio-Legal Analysis of Gendered Authority In Islamic Family Law

Al Fiqri Ardiansyah; Marhamah Annazah Tambunan; Randy Putra Alamsyah; Idrus Afandi Akbar; Nuruddin Nuruddin

doi:10.52496/mjhki.v3i2.100

Authors

Al Fiqri Ardiansyah Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia Author
Marhamah Annazah Tambunan Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia Author
Randy Putra Alamsyah Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia Author
Idrus Afandi Akbar Sakarya Üniversitesi, Türkiye Author
Nuruddin Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52496/mjhki.v3i2.100

Keywords:

Qiwāmah, Epistemic Violence, Qur’anic Exegesis, Islamic Family Law, Gendered Authority

Abstract

The concept of qiwāmah (male authority) in Q.4:34 remains a central yet contested foundation in Islamic family law, particularly in shaping gender roles and marital authority. While classical and modern tafsir have largely legitimized male leadership, existing scholarship tends to focus on reinterpretation or normative critique, leaving a gap in examining the epistemological structures that produce and sustain patriarchal authority. This study investigates qiwāmah as a site of epistemic violence and analyzes how gendered authority is constructed within Qur’anic exegesis and institutionalized in Islamic family law, particularly in the Indonesian Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI). Employing a qualitative approach grounded in critical hermeneutics and socio-legal analysis, the study examines classical, modern, and critical tafsir alongside legal documents. The findings demonstrate that qiwāmah is not a fixed theological doctrine but an epistemic construct shaped through interpretive traditions, juristic reasoning, and legal institutionalization. Patriarchal interpretations are reproduced through the nafaqah ṭā‘ah framework and codified in legal systems, while marginalizing alternative perspectives. This study’s specific contribution lies in advancing epistemic violence as an analytical tool in Qur’anic exegesis, shifting analysis from textual meaning to the structures of knowledge production that sustain legal authority. It further provides a framework for Islamic legal reform, emphasizing the need to reinterpret qiwāmah in light of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, particularly justice and human dignity.

Author Biographies

Al Fiqri Ardiansyah, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia

Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia
Marhamah Annazah Tambunan, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia

Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia
Randy Putra Alamsyah, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia

Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia
Idrus Afandi Akbar, Sakarya Üniversitesi, Türkiye

Sakarya Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Nuruddin, Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram, Indonesia

Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram, Indonesia

References

Abu Zayd, Nasr Hamid. Reformation of Islamic Thought: A Critical Historical Analysis. Amsterdam University Press, 2006.

Al-Ghazali, Abu Hamid. Al-Mustasfa Min ‘Ilm Al-Usul. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1993.

Al-Shatibi, Abu Ishaq. Al-Muwafaqat fi Usul al-Shari‘ah. Beirut: Dar al-Ma‘rifah, 1997.

Al-Qurtubi, Muhammad. Al-Jami’ Li Ahkam Al-Qur’an. Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 2006.

Al-Sharmani, M. “Marriage in Islamic Interpretive Tradition: Revisiting the Legal and the Ethical.” Journal of Islamic Ethics 2, no. 1–2 (2018): 76–96. https://doi.org/10.1163/24685542-12340017.

Al-Ṭabari. Jāmi‘ Al-Bayān ‘an Ta’Wīl Āy Al-Qur’Ān. Beirut: Mu’assasah al-Risālah, 2001.

Al-Zuhayli, Wahbah. Al-Tafsir Al-Munir Fi Al-Aqidah Wa Al-Shari’ah Wa Al-Manhaj. Dar al-Fikr, 2009.

An-Na’im, Abdullahi Ahmed. Islam and Human Rights. Harvard University Press, 2002.

An-Na’im, Abdullahi Ahmed. “Islamic Foundations of Religious Human Rights.” In Religious Human Rights in Global Perspective, edited by John Witte and Johan van der Vyver, 337–59. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 2002.

Auda, Jasser. Maqasid Al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. London: International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2008

Barlas, Asma. Believing Women in Islam. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2002.

Bezgrebelna, M, and T Teo. “Epistemic Violence.” In Encyclopedia of Violence, Peace, & Conflict: Volume 1-4, Third Edition, 4:76–81, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820195-4.00292-2.

Donabed, S. “The Existential Threat of Academic Bias: The Institutionalization of Anti-Assyrian Rhetoric.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 54, no. 3 (2022): 547–53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020743822000770.

Dotson, Kristie. “Tracking Epistemic Violence, Tracking Practices of Silencing.” Hypatia 26, no. 2 (2011): 236–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01177.x.

Flick, Uwe. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, 2014.

Foucault, Michel. Power/Knowledge. Pantheon Books, 1980.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. New York: Continuum, 2004.

Judijanto, Loso, Dwanda Julisa Sistyawan, I Made Kariyasa, and Muhammad Husni Abdulah Pakarti. "Gender Roles and the Redefinition of Family Law: Toward a Modern Family with Justice." Mawaddah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 2, no. 2 (2024): 140–157.

Kathir, Ibn. Tafsir Al-Qur’an Al-‘Azim. Dar al-Tayyibah, 2000.

———. Tafsīr Al-Qur’ān Al-‘Aẓīm. Riyadh: Dār Ṭayyibah, 1999.

Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. Maqasid Al-Shariah Made Simple. London: IIIT, 2008.

Kobat, Hany Khairunnisa, Maila Lidinia, Nesi Alia Putri, Alray Habib Azmi, Muhammad Abrar, and Aulil Amri. "Hukum Keluarga Islam di Arab Saudi: Dinamika, Tantangan, dan Arah Reformasi." Al-Battar: Jurnal Pamungkas Hukum 2, no. 2 (2025): 112–121. https://doi.org/10.63142/al-battar.v2i2.266.

Mir-Hosseini, Ziba. Muslim Family Law Reform and Human Rights: Towards a New Jurisprudence. Oxford: Oneworld Publications, 2009.

———. “Muslim Family Laws and the Challenge of Reform.” Zed Books, 2011.

———. “Muslim Women’s Quest for Equality: Between Islamic Law and Feminism.” Critical Inquiry 32, no. 4 (2006): 629–45. https://doi.org/10.1086/508085.

Nuroniyah, W. “Gender Discourses within Pesantren in Cirebon: Understanding the Typologies of Kyais’ Interpretations of the Concept of Qawwam.” Samarah 7, no. 2 (2023): 875–96. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i2.15689.

Özdemir, S Z. “Islamic Family Law In Morocco: Historical Developments And Reforms.” Ilahiyat Studies 16, no. 1 (2025): 107–22. https://doi.org/10.12730/is.1585555.

Pakarti, Muhammad Husni Abdulah, Diana Farid, Husain, and Yayan Rahtikawati. "Changes in Gender Roles and Family Law Dynamics in Indonesia in the Digital Era." Usroh: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 9, no. 1 (2025): 20–32. https://doi.org/10.19109/ma8d7117.

Rahman, Fazlur. Islam and Modernity. University of Chicago Press, 1982.

Ricoeur, Paul. Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press, 1976.

Rinaldo, R. “Obedience and Authority among Muslim Couples: Negotiating Gendered Religious Scripts in Contemporary Indonesia.” Sociology of Religion: A Quarterly Review 80, no. 3 (2019): 323–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/sry045.

Rokhmad, A, and S Susilo. “Conceptualizing Authority of the Legalization of Indonesian Women’s Rights in Islamic Family Law.” Journal of Indonesian Islam 11, no. 2 (2017): 489–508. https://doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2017.11.2.489-508.

Rubab, I, A Salahuddin, A Siddiqui, and N Javed. “Gendered Household Decision-Making in Lahore: Different Contextual Interpretations of Qawwam in Qur’anic Verse 4:34.” Feminist Theology 34, no. 2 (2026): 154–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/09667350251391785.

Saeed, Abdullah. Islamic Thought: An Introduction. London: Routledge, 2006.

Supartini, Titing Oting, Yayan Rahtikawati, and Supriati Rumagia. "Legitimasi Hukum dan Ketimpangan Gender dalam Isbat Nikah Anak: Studi Putusan PA Tasikmalaya Nomor 283 Pdt.P 2024 PA.Tmk." Al-Battar: Jurnal Pamungkas Hukum 2, no. 2 (2025): 132–144. https://doi.org/10.63142/al-battar.v2i2.287.

Santoso, D, L Shesa, M Asmara, S A A Usmani, and A Syarifudin. “The Understanding of the Jamaah Tabligh on Wife Gender Justice: A Maqāṣid Sharīʿa Review.” Juris: Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah 21, no. 2 (2022): 183–94. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v21i2.6935.

Shihab, M.Quraish. Tafsir Al-Misbah: Pesan, Kesan Dan Keserasian Al-Qur’an,Jilid 2, Hlm 562. Lentera ha. (Jakarta, 2002.

Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, 271–313. University of Illinois Press, 1988.

Wadud, Amina. Qur’an and Woman. Oxford University Press, 1999.

Welchman, L. “A Husband’s Authority: Emerging Formulations in Muslim Family Laws.” International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 25, no. 1 (2011): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebq014.

Welchman, Lynn. Women and Muslim Family Laws in Arab States: A Comparative Overview of Textual Development and Advocacy. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2007.

Wahyudi, Muhammad Husni Abdulah Pakarti, and Diana Farid. "Peran Tradisi dan Norma Gender dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Hukum Keluarga." An-Nisa: Journal of Islamic Family Law 1, no. 3 (2024): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.63142/an-nisa.v1i3.50.

Zein, Ahmad. “Legal Pluralism and Ijtihad in Islamic Economic Law: Revisiting Classical Madhhab Positions.” Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 18, no. 2 (2018): 245–66. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v18i2.8756.

Zumrotun, S, I Muhsin, A Kuswaya, and S Ma’mun. “Islamic Family Law in Diaspora: Negotiating Gender and Marital Authority among Indonesian Muslim Immigrants in Sydney.” Journal of Islamic Law 7, no. 1 (2026): 193–221. https://doi.org/10.24260/jil.v7i1.5687.