Legal Pluralism and Muslim Family Authority in Sustaining Female Circumcision in Serang, Indonesia: A Critical Documentary Analysis

Parta Suhanda; Siti Na Jauharoh; Ema Hikmah; Ida Lindawati; Kamall Aly

doi:10.52496/mjhki.v3i2.127

Authors

Parta Suhanda Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta , Politeknik Kesehatan Negeri Banten, Indonesia Author
Siti Na Jauharoh Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta Author
Ema Hikmah Politeknik Kesehatan Negeri Banten, Indonesia Author
Ida Lindawati Politeknik Kesehatan Negeri Banten, Indonesia Author
Kamall Aly Annikmah Alislamiyyah Highschool, Pnom Penh, Cambodia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52496/mjhki.v3i2.127

Keywords:

Female Circumcision, Legal Pluralism, Socio-Legal, Family Authority, D'Shaman Paraji, Banten

Abstract

Women's circumcision in Serang, Banten, is in a space of legal pluralism that brings together religious, customary, family, health, and state regulatory norms. Previous research has generally examined these practices from the perspective of public health, gender, religion, anthropology, or law in isolation, so it has not explained how these various normative arrangements are mediated in family decision-making. This study aims to analyze the social reproductive mechanisms of female circumcision practices through the development of a Family-Mediated Socio-Legal Reproduction Model. The research uses a qualitative socio-legal approach with critical documentary analysis and thematic synthesis of academic literature, laws and regulations, government policies, public health reports, and religious publications relevant to the Indonesian context, especially Banten. The results of the study show three main findings. First, Muslim families reproduce female circumcision as a symbol of purification, honor, and femininity, even though it has no medical indications. Second, the distribution of authority in the family along with the symbolic position of the paraji shaman transforms religious and customary norms into ritual practices that gain social legitimacy. Third, regulatory fragmentation, differences in definitions of harm, and weak integration between legal and health approaches reduce the effectiveness of state interventions and biomedical evidence. This study also identifies paraji shamans as socio-legal actors who act as cultural intermediaries, holders of symbolic authority, and implementers of local health governance. The findings expand the study of legal pluralism by showing that the effectiveness of legal, medical, religious, and customary norms depends on the mediation process in the family and community. Therefore, prevention strategies require the integration of legal protection, family-based health education, the involvement of traditional practitioners, and the strengthening of religious narratives that place bodily dignity, child protection, and harm prevention as the main principles.

Author Biographies

Parta Suhanda, Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta, Politeknik Kesehatan Negeri Banten, Indonesia

Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia

Politeknik Kesehatan Negeri Banten, Indonesia
Siti Na Jauharoh, Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta

Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia
Ema Hikmah, Politeknik Kesehatan Negeri Banten, Indonesia

Politeknik Kesehatan Negeri Banten, Indonesia
Ida Lindawati, Politeknik Kesehatan Negeri Banten, Indonesia

Politeknik Kesehatan Negeri Banten, Indonesia
Kamall Aly, Annikmah Alislamiyyah Highschool, Pnom Penh, Cambodia

Annikmah Alislamiyyah Highschool, Pnom Penh, Cambodia

References

Abu-Sahlieh, Sami A Aldeeb. Male and Female Circumcision among Jews, Christians and Muslims: Religious, Medical, Social and Legal Debate. Shangri-La Publications, 2006.

Ali, F A, B A Alhaffar, and N Howard. “Women’s Perspectives on Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Abandonment in Somalia: A Qualitative Study.” PLOS Global Public Health 5, no. 5 (2025): e0004571. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004571.

Alkhalaileh, D, S R Hayford, A H Norris, and M F Gallo. “Prevalence and Attitudes on Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting in Egypt since Criminalisation in 2008.” Culture, Health & Sexuality 20, no. 2 (2018): 173–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2017.1337927.

Almeer, R A, B M Al-Shehri, R M Al-Harbi, A F Al-Mutairi, N S Al-Qahtani, and S M Al-Johani. “Female Genital Mutilation in Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 22 (2021): 11950. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211950.

Asmani, Ibrahim Lethome, and Maryam Sheikh Abdi. “De-Linking Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting from Islam.” Frontiers in Reproductive Health Program, Population Council, 2008.

Aubel, Judi. “Grandmother-Inclusive Intergenerational Approaches: The Missing Piece of the Puzzle for Ending FGM/C by 2030?” Frontiers in Sociology 8 (2023): 1196068. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1196068.

Banks, E, O Meirik, T Farley, O Akande, H Bathija, and M Ali. “Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcome: WHO Collaborative Prospective Study in Six African Countries.” The Lancet 367, no. 9525 (2006): 1835–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68805-3.

Bourdieu, Pierre. Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press, 1991.

Bowen, Glenn A. “Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method.” Qualitative Research Journal 9, no. 2 (2009): 27–40.

Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, no. 2 (2006): 77–101.

Brown, Katherine, David Beecham, and Hazel Barrett. “The Applicability of Behaviour Change in Intervention Programmes Targeted at Ending Female Genital Mutilation in the EU: Integrating Social Cognitive and Community Level Approaches.” Obstetrics and Gynecology International 2013 (2013): 324362. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/324362.

Budiharsana, Meiwita, Lila Amaliah, Budi Utomo, and Erwinia. “Female Circumcision in Indonesia: Extent, Implications and Possible Interventions to Uphold Women’s Health Rights.” Population Council, 2003.

Butler, J. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London & New York: Routledge, 1990.

Cappa, Claudia, Carly Thomson, and Colleen Murray. “Decision-Making Process in Female Genital Mutilation: A Systematic Review.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 10 (2020): 3362. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103362.

Connell, Raewyn. Gender: In World Perspective. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity, 2009.

Denzin, N K. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. Routledge, 2017.

El-Gibaly, O, M Aziz, S Abou Hussein, and G H Sayed. “Health Care Providers’ and Mothers’ Perceptions about the Medicalization of Female Genital Mutilation or Cutting in Egypt: A Cross-Sectional Qualitative Study.” BMC International Health and Human Rights 19 (2019): 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12914-019-0202-x.

El-Gibaly, Omaima, Barbara Ibrahim, Barbara S Mensch, and Wesley H Clark. “The Decline of Female Circumcision in Egypt: Evidence and Interpretation.” Social Science & Medicine 54, no. 2 (2002): 205–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00020-X.

Feillard, Andree, and Lies Marcoes. “Female Circumcision in Indonesia: To ‘Islamize’ in Ceremony or Secrecy.” Archipel 56 (1998): 337–67. https://doi.org/10.3406/arch.1998.3495.

Flick, Uwe. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, 2014.

Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction. Edited by Robert Hurley. Pantheon Books, 1978.

Griffiths, John. “Legal Pluralism.” In " In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition, 970–78, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.86073-0.

Griffiths, John. “What Is Legal Pluralism?” Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 18, no. 24 (1986): 1–55.

Handayani, S, Suharmiati, Karlina, and Y F Wardhani. “Relevansi, Efektivitas Dan Sustainabilitas Model Pemberdayaan Paraji Dan Kokolot Dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Persalinan Di Fasilitas Kesehatan.” Health Science Journal of Indonesia / Buletin Penelitian Sistem Kesehatan 24, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.22435/hsr.v24i1.3406.

Hidayana, Irwan Martua. “The Medicalization of Female Genital Cutting (FGC) in Indonesia: A Complex Intersection of Tradition, Religion, and Human Rights.” Current Sexual Health Reports 16, no. 4 (2024): 217–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-024-00393-2.

Isnayanti, Isnayanti, Muhammad Ghifary Ramadani Mallo, and Muhammad Nabil Ardhani. “Hadith Authority in Late Modern Islamic Ethics: Reframing Transmission, Rational Deliberation, and Normative Moral Reasoning.” Dialogues in Qur’anic and Hadith Studies 1, no. 1 (2026): 77–101. https://journal.bahsisfikr.or.id/index.php/DQHS/article/view/15.

Indonesia, Ministry of Health of the Republic of. “Regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6 of 2014 Concerning the Revocation of Regulation of the Minister of Health Number 1636/Menkes/Per/XII/2010 Concerning Female Circumcision.” Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia, 2014.

Indonesia, Ministry of Religious Affairs Republic of. “Pedoman Bimbingan Perkawinan,” 2020.

Indonesia, Republic of. Presidential Instruction of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1991 concerning the Dissemination of the Compilation of Islamic Law, Compilation of Islamic Law in Indonesia § (1991).

Indonesia, Supreme Court of the Republic of. “Annual Report of the Supreme Court 2023.” Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, 2023.

Indonesia, Yayasan Kesehatan Perempuan. “Sunat Perempuan Di Indonesia: Praktik Kekerasan Berbasis Gender Yang Masih Mengancam.” YKP Indonesia, 2025. https://ykpindonesia.org/id/sunat-perempuan-di-indonesia-praktik-kekerasan-berbasis-gender-yang-masih-mengancam/.

Jaya, J, Y Kim, and M Kang. “Cutting through Complexity: An Intersectional Analysis of Female Genital Cutting in Indonesia.” Social Science & Medicine 347 (2024): 116771.

Kandiyoti, Deniz. “Women, Islam, and the State.” In Political Islam: Essays from Middle East Report, 2023. https://doi.org/10.2307/3012623.

KBR. “Perjuangan Ulama-Ulama Perempuan Banten Hapus Sunat Perempuan.” KBR, 2024. https://kbr.id/articles/ragam/perjuangan-ulama-ulama-perempuan-banten-hapus-sunat-perempuan.

Kimani, Samuel, and Bettina Shell-Duncan. “Medicalized Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: Contentious Practices and Persistent Debates.” Current Sexual Health Reports 10, no. 1 (2018): 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-018-0140-y.

Kleinman, Arthur, Leon Eisenberg, and Byron Good. “Culture, Illness, and Care: Clinical Lessons from Anthropologic and Cross-Cultural Research.” Annals of Internal Medicine 88, no. 2 (1978): 251–58.

Koto, Rahmayati, M. Farhan Hidayat, and Maisarah Siregar. “Gender, Authority, and Qur’anic Legal Interpretation: Reframing Contemporary Debates on Women’s Interpretive Agency.” Journal of Qur’anic Legal Studies and Exegesis 1, no. 1 (2026): 1–20. https://journal.bahsisfikr.or.id/index.php/JQLSE/article/view/8.

Lock, Margaret, and Vinh-Kim Nguyen. An Anthropology of Biomedicine. 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell, 2018.

Lutfi, A P K, and S L Wahyuningroem. “Opresi Dan Kuasa Atas Tubuh Perempuan Dalam Tradisi Masyarakat Budaya: Studi Kasus Sunat Perempuan Di Banten.” Jurnal Perempuan 28, no. 1 (2023): 37–47. https://doi.org/10.34309/jp.v28i1.808.

Many, 28 Too. “Religion and FGM/C.” Orchid Project, 2022. https://www.fgmcri.org/media/uploads/Thematic Research and Resources/Religion/religion_factsheet_print-friendly_page_v2_%28april_2022%29.pdf.

Merry, Sally Engle. “Legal Pluralism.” Law & Society Review 22, no. 5 (1988): 869–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053638.

Moore, Sally Falk. “Law and Social Change: The Semi-Autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Subject of Study.” Law & Society Review 7, no. 4 (1973): 719–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/3052967.

Mutilation, UNFPA-UNICEF Joint Programme on the Elimination of Female Genital. “Manual on Social Norms and Change.” United Nations Population Fund and United Nations Children’s Fund, 2022. https://www.unfpa.org/publications/manual-social-norms-and-change-2022.

Nations, United. “International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,” 1966.

Nurdiana, G, and E Susanti. “Negotiating the Meaning of Female Genital Mutilation and Cutting: A Symbolic Interactionist Approach among Religious University Students.” Islamic Communication Journal 10, no. 1 (2025).

Organization, World Health. “Female Genital Mutilation.” World Health Organization, 2024. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/female-genital-mutilation.

Patton, Michael Q. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications, 2015.

Research, International Islamic Centre for Population Studies and, and UNICEF. “Female Circumcision: Between the Incorrect Use of Science and the Misunderstood Doctrine.” Al-Azhar University and UNICEF, 2013.

Suparmi, S, I Saptarini, and N Amaliah. “Hubungan Faktor Sosio-Demografi Terhadap Sunat Perempuan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Kesehatan Reproduksi 7, no. 1 (2016): 1–10.

Tag-Eldin, Mohammed A, Mohammed A Gadallah, Mohammed N Al-Tayeb, Mohamed Abdel-Aty, Emad Mansour, and Mona Sallem. “Prevalence of Female Genital Cutting among Egyptian Girls.” Bulletin of the World Health Organization 86, no. 4 (2008): 269–74. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.07.042093.

Titaley, Christiana R, Cynthia L Hunter, Michael J Dibley, and Peter Heywood. “Why Do Some Women Still Prefer Traditional Birth Attendants and Home Delivery? A Qualitative Study on Delivery Care Services in West Java Province, Indonesia.” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 10 (2010): 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-10-43.

Tønnessen, L. “Between Sharia and CEDAW in Sudan: Islamist Women Negotiating Gender Equity.” In Gender Justice and Legal Pluralities: Latin American and African Perspectives, 133–55, 2013. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203084434-11.

Tambunan, Marhamah Annazah, and Maulida Fitria. “Digital Fatwas and the Transformation of Religious Authority in Contemporary Muslim Societies.” Islamicate Futures: Knowledge, Ethics, and Muslim Societies 1, no. 1 (2026): 96–123. https://journal.bahsisfikr.or.id/index.php/IFKEMS/article/view/41.

UNICEF. “Female Genital Mutilation: A Global Concern--2024 Update.” UNICEF Data, 2024. https://data.unicef.org/resources/female-genital-mutilation-a-global-concern-2024/.