Judicial Reluctance and Legal Gaps in Recognizing Gambling as a Ground for Divorce: An Islamic Law Analysis of Decisions of the Pekanbaru Religious Court

Fadel Muhammad; Zulfahmi Bustami; Muhammad Darwis; Pujangga Candrawijayaning Fajri; Naimah Mohamad Nasir

doi:10.52496/mjhki.v4i1.32

Authors

Fadel Muhammad Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau Author
Zulfahmi Bustami Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau Author
Muhammad Darwis Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau Author
Pujangga Candrawijayaning Fajri Universitas Harapan Bangsa Author
Naimah Mohamad Nasir International Islamic University Malaysia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52496/mjhki.v4i1.32

Keywords:

Divorce Law, Gambling, Islamic Law, Judicial Reasoning

Abstract

This study is motivated by the empirical finding that judges in the Religious Court Class 1A Pekanbaru do not explicitly use gambling as a legal ground for divorce, despite its inclusion in Government Regulation No. 9 of 1975 Article 19(a) and the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) Article 116(a). Moreover, Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage does not specifically recognize gambling as a cause of divorce, resulting in limited legal protection for affected parties. This research aims to analyze judicial reasoning and standards in adjudicating divorce cases involving gambling from an Islamic law perspective. This study employs a qualitative normative legal approach based on secondary data, utilizing statutory, case, and historical approaches. Data were collected through literature review and supported by interviews, and analyzed using qualitative analytical techniques to derive systematic and interpretative conclusions. The findings reveal that judges tend not to explicitly consider gambling as a primary ground for divorce, instead relying on arguments of continuous disputes and conflicts. Consequently, the normative provisions of Government Regulation No. 9 of 1975 Article 19(a) and KHI Article 116(a) are not optimally applied. From an Islamic law perspective, which prioritizes family welfare (maslahah), gambling can constitute a legitimate (syar’i) ground for divorce. In conclusion, there is a normative and practical gap in judicial application, indicating the need for legal reform. This study recommends strengthening legal provisions by explicitly incorporating gambling as a ground for divorce through amendments to Law No. 1 of 1974 to ensure legal certainty and protection.

Author Biographies

Fadel Muhammad, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia
Zulfahmi Bustami, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia
Muhammad Darwis, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia
Pujangga Candrawijayaning Fajri, Universitas Harapan Bangsa

Universitas Harapan Bangsa, Indonesia
Naimah Mohamad Nasir, International Islamic University Malaysia

International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia

References

Adinda Firsta Deni Maharani, Djanuardi Djanuardi, and Sherly Machmud Imam Slamet. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Putusnya Hubungan Perkawinan Akibat Perceraian Yang Disebabkan Oleh Perilaku Gemar Berjudi Ditinjau Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Perkawinan Dan Hukum Islam.” Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum Dan Humaniora 2, no. 3 (July 19, 2024): 398–416. https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v2i3.1508.

Agus, Suryana, Noviansyah Indra, and Tamara Farah. “Dampak Perjudian Online Slot Di Kalangan Pemuda Terhadap Semangat Kerja Di Kecamatan Cisalak.” EduInovasi: Journal of Basic Educational Studies 4, no. 3 (2024): 85–97.

Aziz, Abdul. “The Phenomenon of Divorce Is Caused by Online Gambling in East Jakarta.” Al-Madinah: Journal of Islamic Civilization 1, no. 2 (December 17, 2024): 197–210. https://doi.org/10.70901/2brpvm36.

Birawa, Arbian Sukma, and Hamim Zaky Hadibasyir. “Spatial Analysis of Comparison of Divorce Rates before, during COVID-19 Pandemic, and New Normal in Bandung City.” Proceeding ISETH (International Summit on Science, Technology, and Humanity), January 21, 2025, 180–90. https://doi.org/10.23917/iseth.5359.

Desvia, Lusiana, Rusydi An, Akmal Yandi, Thomas Febria, and Umu Huzaemah. “Divorce Lawsuit on the Reason Husband Is Addicted to Online Gambling.” Jurnal Elsyakhshi 2, no. 2 (2024).

Fatmawati, Fatmawati, and Kasmiati Kasmiati. “PENYEBAB PERCERAIAN DALAM KELUARGA DI KOTA PALU.” Musawa: Journal for Gender Studies 13, no. 2 (December 31, 2021): 150–69. https://doi.org/10.24239/msw.v13i2.858.

Imran, Maizul. “Islamic Mass Organizations Figures ’ Views on Ul ī Al- Amr : Implications for Indonesian Democracy and Compliance with The Government Musda Asmara Keywords :” 20, no. 2 (2025): 341–69.

Irawati, Arista Candra, and Eugenia Brandao Da Silva. “Beyond Formality in Indonesian Pretrial Law: KUHAP Reform, Human Rights, and Islamic Law.” Al-Ahkam 35, no. 2 (October 1, 2025): 261–86. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2025.35.2.28399.

Jusoh Yusoff, Amir Fazlim, and Iffah Abd Razak. “Sharia Issues on Loot Boxes in Online Games and Esport.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 7, no. 1 (March 31, 2023): 341. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i1.16023.

Khilmi, Akhmad Saifudin, Ahmad Izzuddin, and Miftahul Huda. “Kecanduan Judi Online Sebagai Alasan Perceraian: Analisis Yuridis Perlindungan Anak Harta.” Jurnal Riset Hukum Keluarga Islam, December 23, 2025, 99–110. https://doi.org/10.29313/jrhki.v5i2.7573.

Latif, Muhammad, Lia Amaliya, and Muhamad Abas. “Pengaruh Judi Online Sebagai Penyebab Perceraian Ditinjau Dalam Hukum Perkawinan Di Indonesia (Studi Putusan No. 2450/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Krw).” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik 6, no. 1 (October 20, 2025): 78–79. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v6i1.6287.

Mardiyah, Siti, Hamda Sulfinadia, and Abdurrahman Raden Aji. “Resolution Of Household Conflicts Due To Different Choices Of Presidential Candidates Perspective Of Islamic Law” 3 (2025): 43–64.

Muhammad Zubir. “SUAMI PENJUDI SEBAGAI ALASAN FASAKH NIKAH(Analisa Komparatif Penalaran Hukum Fikih Syāfi’iyyah Dan Pasal 116 KHI).” Jurnal Syariah Dan Ekonomi Islam 2, no. 1 (June 18, 2024): 54–66. https://doi.org/10.71025/nnpb1n63.

Muji Buddin SM, M, Dody Sulistio, Mochammad Irfan Achfandhy, Muhammad Alfan Sidik, and Muhammad Nurul Mubin. “ISLAMIC LAW, THE CONSTITUTION, AND DIGITAL MEDIA: A Study of Islamic Discourse Construction in Contemporary Indonesia.” Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan 25, no. 2 (December 22, 2025): 20–36. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v25i2.1951.

Marta, Rahma Fitria, Fakhrurrazi M. Yunus, Nurul Fithria, Ozioma Victoria Uchime, and Nur Farahin Afiqah Daud , trans. 2026. “Child Custody in Divorce of Husband Abandonment: Judge’s Subjectivity Based on the Benefit of the Child Determination No. 310 Pdt.G 2023 MS. Bna”. Al-Battar: Jurnal Pamungkas Hukum 3 (1): 67-81. https://doi.org/10.63142/al-battar.v3i1.490.

Muttalib, Abdul, Jumarim, and Muhammad Mutawali. “Fenomenologi Perkawinan Anak: Sudut Pandang Tokoh Agama, Adat, Dan Pemerintah Lombok.” Jurnal Riset Hukum Keluarga Islam, December 27, 2025, 79–90. https://doi.org/10.29313/jrhki.v5i2.7351.

Nur, Muhammad, Siti Maymanatun Nisa, Tashdieq Ulil, and Amri Arhamzah. “From Text to Context : The Role of Kyai in Shaping Modern Islamic Inheritance Law” 19, no. 1 (2025): 31–50.

Omar Saad Ahmed, Hussein Ajlan Hasan, Sameer Dawood Salman Bazool, Aigul Mirzaeva, and Oudha Yousif Salman Al-Musawi. “Fitnah in the Digital Age: Regulating Social Media Misuse Through Islamic Criminal Principles.” Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam 10, no. 2 (August 13, 2025): 535–62. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v10i2.13369.

Rahmayanti, Putri, Hambari Hambari, Rusdi Kasman, and Zuhratun Nakhwah. “Analysis of the Decision of the Bogor Religious Court on the Causes of Divorce of Husband and Wife Due to Online Gambling.” MIZAN: JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC LAW 13, no. 1 (2025).

Reyhan, Muhammad, Givani Hendrasjah, Radea Yuli, and A Hambali. “Dampak Berjudi Dalam Pandangan Islam.” Gunung Djati Conference Series 19 (2023): 820.

Risma Wulandari. “Analisis Hukum Islam Dalam Pertimbangan Hakim Putusan Pengadilan Agama (PA) Mojokerto No.2161/Pdt.G/2021/Pa.Mr.” Sakinah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 1, no. 1 (2023).

Sani, Indira Aprilia, Sahmiar Pulungan, and Nurcahaya Nurcahaya. “Analisis Putusnya Perkawinan Akibat Pertengkaran Karena Media Sosial Di Pengadilan Agama Kota Kisaran.” Kamaya: Jurnal Ilmu Agama 6, no. 4 (November 2, 2023): 472–86. https://doi.org/10.37329/kamaya.v6i4.2732.

Sania, Eka Nur, Ahmad Munir, and Rusydi Rusydi. “Dasar Alasan Gugat Cerai Oleh Istri Terhadap Suami Yang Kecanduan Judi Online.” LAW Specialist Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 1, no. 1 (2025).

Shailaja, B, S Chaudhury, A Javadekar, and D Saldanha. “Case Report: Unusual Presentation of Problematic Pornography Use with Comorbid Delusional Disorder.” Indian Journal of Psychiatry 60, no. 5 Supplement 1 (2018).

Sukur, Mukhamad, and Nurush Shobahah. “SYIQAQ SEBAGAI ALASAN PERCERAIAN DI PENGADILAN AGAMA TULUNGAGUNG.” Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Islam 9, no. 1 (July 31, 2021): 175–92. https://doi.org/10.21274/ahkam.2021.9.1.175-192.

Tahir, Heri, Andi Aco Agus, and ni’matul Aliyah Fajri Utari. “ANALISIS TERHADAP FAKTOR PENYEBAB TINGKAT PERCERAIAN DI PENGADILAN AGAMA WATANSOPPENG.” Tomalebbi : Jurnal Pemikiran, Penelitian Hukum, Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraaan 10, no. 3 (2023).

Tanabe, H, and D Okazaki. “Group Psychotherapy for Gambling Disorder in a Local Mental Health and Welfare Center in Japan.” Journal of Behavioral Addictions 8, no. Supplement 1 (2019).

Zubir, Muhammad. “Suami Penjudi Sebagai Alasan Fasakh Nikah (Analisa Komparatif Penalaran Hukum Fikih Syāfi’iyyah Dan Pasal 116 KHI).” QISTHOSIA : Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum 5, no. 2 (December 30, 2024): 127–37. https://doi.org/10.46870/jhki.v5i2.1150.