Reconstructing Sharia Competent Notarial Authority in Indonesia: Legal Pluralism and Gender Justice in Islamic Family Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52496/mjhki.v3i2.42Keywords:
Islamic Family Law Reform, Notarial Authority, Legal Pluralism, Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah, Gender Justice, Indonesian Religious CourtsAbstract
This study examines the structural position of notarial authority within Indonesia’s plural Islamic family law system, particularly the tension between formal authenticity under civil law and substantive compliance with Islamic legal principles. In practice, notarial deeds in family matters such as marriage agreements, inheritance arrangements, and marital property settlements possess strong evidentiary value, yet their conformity with Islamic legal norms is not always ensured in Religious Court adjudication. Despite the growing involvement of notaries in family-related legal documentation, limited scholarship has addressed the institutional gap between civil notarial authority and Sharia compliance standards in Indonesia’s Islamic family law governance. This study therefore investigates how Religious Courts assess notarial deeds in Islamic family law disputes and what regulatory framework is required to ensure both legal validity and Sharia compliance. Using a qualitative normative–doctrinal approach, the research analyzes statutory regulations alongside selected Religious Court decisions from 2019–2023. The findings reveal a regulatory and professional competency gap: although notaries are authorized to draft authentic deeds, courts frequently conduct substantive review to evaluate Sharia compliance, gender implications, and distributive justice. Theoretically, this study contributes to socio-legal scholarship on Islamic legal pluralism by conceptualizing a model of Sharia-Competent Notarial Authority integrating maqāṣid al-sharīʿah and gender justice perspectives. The study recommends incorporating mandatory Sharia competency standards for notaries involved in Islamic family law documentation to strengthen legal certainty and religious legitimacy.
References
Adhikari, N., M. Chhajed, D. Raichura, and P. Bhavathankar. 2025. “LexChain: A Blockchain-Based Solution to Safeguard Electronic Evidence in Legal Systems.” In ISDFS 2025 – 13th International Symposium on Digital Forensics and Security. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISDFS65363.2025.11012076.
Alias, M. A. Aiman, W. A. F. Wan Ismail, A. S. Baharuddin, H. Hashim, and M. S. Mallow. 2025. “An Appraisal of the Legal Framework Governing the Admissibility of Electronic Documents as Evidence in Malaysian Shariah Courts: Current Practices and Future Legal Directions.” IIUM Law Journal 33 (2): 69–108. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v33i2.1077.
Al-Daihani, M., S. Sarif, K. A. Dirie, F. Djafri, and A. Muneem. 2025. “Achieving Wealth Preservation via Islamic Crowdfunding: An Analysis from Maqasidic View.” Millah: Journal of Religious Studies 24 (2): 937–82. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol24.iss2.ar12.
Alnaief, M., and M. Haswa. 2024. “Nikah Al-Misyar (Traveller’s Marriage): Between Contemporary Islamic Jurisprudence and Emirati Law.” Manchester Journal of Transnational Islamic Law and Practice 20 (1): 187–200.
An-Na’im, Abdullahi Ahmed. 2002. “Islamic Foundations of Religious Human Rights.” In Religious Human Rights in Global Perspective, edited by John Witte and Johan van der Vyver, 337–59. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Anggraini, C. P., D. Akbar, and M. F. I. Ummah. 2024. “Women’s Leadership in Islamic Law: Between Normative Foundations and Contemporary Realities.” Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies 3 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17366381.
Awang, A. B., M. M. Abdullah, A. Awang, and N. M. Nasir. 2025. “An Analysis of the Justice of Faraid Law in Relation to the Concept of Qiwamah in the Sustainability of the Muslim Family Institution.” El-Usrah 8 (2): 1160–83. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v8i2.26431.
Bahtiri, B., and G. Asllani. 2024. “The Development of Notary as Free Legal Profession in Kosovo.” Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 7 (2): 262–82. https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-7.2-a000206.
Benda-Beckmann, Franz von, and Keebet von Benda-Beckmann. 2006. “The Dynamics of Change and Continuity in Plural Legal Orders.” Journal of Legal Pluralism 38 (53–54): 1–44.
Bishin, B. G., and F. M. Cherif. 2017. “Women, Property Rights, and Islam.” Comparative Politics 49 (4): 501–19. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041517821273026.
Creswell, John W. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Denzin, Norman K., and Yvonna S. Lincoln. 2018. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Djawas, M., A. Nurdin, M. Zainuddin, and Z. Idami. 2024. “Harmonization of State, Custom, and Islamic Law in Aceh: Perspective of Legal Pluralism.” Hasanuddin Law Review 10 (1): 64–82. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v10i1.4824.
Dungga, W. A., M. H. Muhtar, and L. Djaafar. 2023. “The Assessment of Indonesia’s Religious Courts in Resolving Shari’ah Banking Disputes According to the Principles of Justice.” Manchester Journal of Transnational Islamic Law and Practice 19 (3): 179–93.
Engelcke, Dörthe. 2018. “Law-Making in Jordan: Family Law Reform and the Supreme Justice Department.” Islamic Law and Society 25: 274–309. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-00253P04.
Griffiths, John. 1986. “What Is Legal Pluralism?” Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 18 (24): 1–55.
Hooker, M. B. 2008. Indonesian Syariah: Defining a National School of Islamic Law. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Hutchinson, Terry, and Nigel Duncan. 2012. “Defining and Describing What We Do: Doctrinal Legal Research.” Deakin Law Review 17 (1): 83–119.
Indonesia, Supreme Court of the Republic of. 2023. Annual Report of the Supreme Court 2023. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.
Jahar, A. S. 2019. “Bureaucratizing Sharia in Modern Indonesia: The Case of Zakat, Waqf and Family Law.” Studia Islamika 26 (2): 207–45. https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v26i2.7797.
Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. 2008. Shari‘ah Law: An Introduction. Oxford: Oneworld.
Lindsey, Tim. 2012. Islam, Law and the State in Southeast Asia: Indonesia, Malaysia and Brunei. London: I.B. Tauris.
Lois, F. A. L. 2024. “Teaching of Notarial Law through Virtual Campuses from a Constructivist Approach in Semi-Face-to-Face Education.” Revista Pedagogía Universitaria y Didáctica del Derecho 11 (2): 39–54. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-5885.2024.72714.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2017. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Mawardi, A. I., and A. K. Riza. 2019. “Why Did Kompilasi Hukum Islam Succeed While Its Counter Legal Draft Failed?” Journal of Indonesian Islam 13 (2): 421–53. https://doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2019.13.2.421-453.
Merry, Sally Engle. 1988. “Legal Pluralism.” Law & Society Review 22 (5): 869–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053638.
Merryman, John Henry, and Rogelio Pérez-Perdomo. 2007. The Civil Law Tradition. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Mir-Hosseini, Ziba. 2009. Muslim Family Law Reform and Human Rights: Towards a New Jurisprudence. Oxford: Oneworld.
N’Diaye, M. 2016. “The Reform of the Moudawana: A Revolution?” Studies in Religion 45 (2): 146–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008429816636082.
Otto, Jan Michiel. 2010. Sharia Incorporated: A Comparative Overview of the Legal Systems of Twelve Muslim Countries. Leiden: Leiden University Press.
Shaw, G. 2016. “Notaries in Central Europe: From State Employment to Professional Independence—A Rocky Path.” In Central and Eastern Europe After Transition, 255–75. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315571119-16.
Soekanto, Soerjono, and Sri Mamudji. 2001. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Welchman, Lynn. 2007. Women and Muslim Family Laws in Arab States. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Wirastri, T. D., and S. C. van Huis. 2024. “The State of Indonesia’s Marriage Law: 50 Years of Statutory and Judicial Reforms.” Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 24 (2): 215–32. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v24i2.38424.
Yin, Robert K. 2018. Case Study Research and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Chaerul Anwar, Abdullah Sulaiman, Yayan Sopyan (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.













