Reinterpreting Ḍarb In Islamic Family Law: A Maqāṣid-Based Socio-Legal Approach

Authors

  • Muhammad Amar Adly Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara image/svg+xml Author
  • Ardiansyah Ardiansyah Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara image/svg+xml Author
  • Hasan Matsum Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara image/svg+xml Author
  • Fikfik Taufik Muhammadiyah Bandung University image/svg+xml Author
  • Najib A. Gisymar Universitas Widya Mataram, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52496/mjhki.v4i1.89

Keywords:

Ḍarb, Islamic Family Law, Uṣūl al-Fiqh, Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah, Socio-Legal, Domestic Violence, Gender Justice

Abstract

Domestic violence in Muslim family contexts is sometimes reinforced by literalist interpretations of QS. An-Nisāʾ: 34, especially the term ḍarb, which has often been read as permitting physical discipline within marriage. This study aims to reconstruct the meaning of ḍarb in Islamic family law in order to prevent its use as a religious justification for domestic violence. Using a qualitative normative method with a socio-legal orientation, the study examines classical tafsīr, the views of the four Sunni legal schools, Prophetic traditions, and Indonesian legal instruments on domestic violence. The analysis combines uṣūl al-fiqh, maqāṣid-based reasoning, and contextual interpretation to assess whether classical legal meanings remain valid when they produce harm in contemporary family life. The findings show that classical Islamic legal sources did not treat ḍarb as an unrestricted right of husbands. Instead, they placed it under strict limitations, including procedural sequence, non-injury, ethical restraint, and legal accountability. The Prophetic model further shifts the norm toward non-violence, compassion, and protection of dignity. Based on these findings, this study argues that ḍarb should be reconstructed not as physical punishment, but as a restricted and non-violent mechanism of conflict resolution oriented toward reconciliation and harm prevention. The study contributes to Islamic family law reform by offering an uṣūlī–socio-legal framework that can guide religious judges, mediators, family-law institutions, and anti-domestic violence policy in preventing the misuse of religious texts to legitimize violence.

Author Biographies

  • Muhammad Amar Adly, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

    Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia

  • Ardiansyah Ardiansyah, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

    Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia

  • Hasan Matsum, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

    Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia

  • Fikfik Taufik, Muhammadiyah Bandung University

    Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung, Indonesia

  • Najib A. Gisymar, Universitas Widya Mataram, Indonesia

    Universitas Widya Mataram, Indonesia

References

Abidin, K., et al. (2025). Determinants of domestic violence in Indonesia from a gender and sociology of law perspective. El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, 8(2), 701–723. https://doi.org/10.22373/0t3bc059

Al-Turabi, Uthman Mehdad, dan Jasser Auda. “Toward a Maqāṣid-Based Legal Reform: Systemic Thinking for Social Transformation in the Modern Muslim World.” Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law 8, no. 2 (2025): 209–228. https://doi.org/10.35719/fhw10v84

Abou El Fadl, K. (2001). Speaking in God’s name: Islamic law, authority and women. Oneworld.

Abou El Fadl, K. (2004). Islam and the challenge of democracy. Princeton University Press.

Abū Dāwūd, S. ibn al-Ashʿath. (n.d.). Sunan Abī Dāwūd. Dār al-Risālah al-ʿĀlamiyyah.

Ali, K. (2016). Sexual ethics and Islam: Feminist reflections on Qur’an, Hadith, and jurisprudence (2nd ed.). Oneworld.

Ali, K. (2010). Marriage and slavery in early Islam. Harvard University Press.

Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid al-Sharīʿah as philosophy of Islamic law: A systems approach. International Institute of Islamic Thought.

Barlas, A. (2002). “Believing women” in Islam: Unreading patriarchal interpretations of the Qur’an. University of Texas Press.

Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.

Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. Routledge.

Ehrlich, E. (1936). Fundamental principles of the sociology of law (W. L. Moll, Trans.). Harvard University Press.

Ewick, P., & Silbey, S. S. (1998). The common place of law: Stories from everyday life. University of Chicago Press.

Fineman, M. A. (2004). The autonomy myth: A theory of dependency. New Press.

Fineman, M. A. (2008). The vulnerable subject: Anchoring equality in the human condition. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 20(1), 1–23.

Friedman, L. M. (1975). The legal system: A social science perspective. Russell Sage Foundation.

Fitri, Inayatul, Zaiyad Zubaidi, Muhammad Husnul, Bilaly Sangare, and Isa Olawale Solahudeen. 2026. “Marital Maintenance Neglect and Divorce Dynamics: An Empirical Socio-Legal Study in Gampong Neuheun, Aceh Besar”. An-Nisa: Journal of Islamic Family Law 3 (1): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.63142/an-nisa.v3i1.491.

Hallaq, W. B. (1997). A history of Islamic legal theories: An introduction to Sunni uṣūl al-fiqh. Cambridge University Press.

Hallaq, W. B. (2009). Sharīʿa: Theory, practice, transformations. Cambridge University Press.

Ibn ʿĀshūr, M. al-Ṭāhir. (2006). Maqāṣid al-sharīʿah al-Islāmiyyah. Dār al-Nafāʾis.

Ibn al-Humām, K. al-Dīn. (1970). Sharḥ Fatḥ al-Qadīr ʿalā al-Hidāyah (Vol. 5). Muṣṭafā al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī.

Ibn Kathīr, I. ibn ʿUmar. (1999). Tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-ʿAẓīm (2nd ed., Vol. 2). Dār Ṭayyibah.

Ibn Mājah, M. ibn Yazīd. (n.d.). Sunan Ibn Mājah. Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Kutub al-ʿArabiyyah.

Ibn Qudāmah, M. al-Dīn ʿAbd Allāh ibn Aḥmad. (1997). Al-Mughnī (3rd ed., Vol. 10). Dār ʿĀlam al-Kutub.

Ibn Rushd al-Qurṭubī, A. al-Walīd M. ibn Aḥmad. (1988). Al-Muqaddimāt al-mumahhidāt li-mā taḍammanat-hu al-Mudawwanah min al-aḥkām al-sharʿiyyah wa-al-arāʾ al-fiqhiyyah (Vol. 1). Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī.

Indonesia. (1991). Instruksi Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 1991 tentang Penyebarluasan Kompilasi Hukum Islam.

Indonesia. (2004). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga.

Indonesia. (2022). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual.

Ismah, N. (2025). Issuing justice: Women ulama, fatwas, and the ratification of Indonesia’s Sexual Violence Crime Bill. African Journal of Gender and Religion, 31(1), 65–91.

Jackson, S. A. (1996). Islamic law and the state: The constitutional jurisprudence of Shihāb al-Dīn al-Qarāfī. Brill.

Jamhuri, J., & Rafiah, R. (2019). Upaya meminimalisir kasus KDRT di Aceh: Studi kasus P2TP2A Provinsi Aceh. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam, 3(1), 89–116. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v3i1.4954

Jones, B., & Aftab, A. (2023). Inside Indonesia’s Religious Courts: An argument for domestic and family violence screening and exemption from compulsory mediation. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 12(2), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwad015

Jalaludin, Akhmad, Bunga Desyana Pratami, Mubarok, dan Md Yazid Ahmad. “Cultural Negotiations in the Vernacularization of Islamic Inheritance Law in Indonesia: A Socio-Legal and Maqaṣid al-Shariʿah Approach.” Jurnal Hukum Islam 24, no. 1 (2026): 137–172. https://doi.org/10.28918/jhi_v24i1_05

Juwaynī, I. al-Ḥaramayn. (1997). Al-Burhān fī uṣūl al-fiqh (ʿA. al-ʿAẓīm al-Dīb, Ed.). Qatar University Press.

Kamali, M. H. (2003). Principles of Islamic jurisprudence (3rd rev. ed.). Islamic Texts Society.

Kamali, M. H. (2008). Sharīʿah law: An introduction. Oneworld.

Kāsānī, ʿA. al-Dīn. (1910). Badāʾiʿ al-ṣanāʾiʿ fī tartīb al-sharāʾiʿ (Vol. 2). Maṭbaʿat al-Jamāliyyah.

Khalīl ibn Isḥāq al-Jundī. (2008). Al-Tawḍīḥ fī sharḥ al-Mukhtaṣar al-farʿī li-Ibn al-Ḥājib (Vol. 4). Markaz al-Najīb lil-Baḥth al-ʿIlmī wa-Khidmah al-Turāth.

Kiljamilawati, et al. (2025). Implementation of the Supreme Court’s letter in divorce cases due to domestic violence within the Religious Court. Alauddin Law Development Journal, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.24252/aldev.v7i1.52867

Kodir, F. A. (2022). Metodologi fatwa KUPI: Pokok-pokok pikiran musyawarah keagamaan Kongres Ulama Perempuan Indonesia (M. Wahid, Ed.). KUPI.

Komisi Nasional Anti Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan. (2025). Catatan tahunan kekerasan terhadap perempuan tahun 2024: Menata data, menajamkan arah: Refleksi pendokumentasian dan tren kasus kekerasan terhadap perempuan 2024. Komnas Perempuan. https://komnasperempuan.go.id/catatan-tahunan

Lokot, M., et al. (2024). Decolonising the field of violence against women and girls: A scoping review and recommendations for research and programming. Social Science & Medicine, 357, 117168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117168

MacKinnon, C. A. (1987). Feminism unmodified: Discourses on life and law. Harvard University Press.

MacKinnon, C. A. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of the state. Harvard University Press.

Maḥallī, J. al-Dīn, & Suyūṭī, J. al-Dīn. (2003). Tafsīr al-Jalālayn al-muyassar (1st ed.). Maktabah Lubnān Nāshirūn.

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2023). Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2023 tentang pemberlakuan rumusan hasil rapat pleno kamar Mahkamah Agung tahun 2023 sebagai pedoman pelaksanaan tugas bagi pengadilan. Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2026). Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia: Putusan terkait “Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga”. Accessed May 20, 2026. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/search.html/?q=%22Kekerasan+dalam+rumah+tangga%22

Martitah, M., et al. (2024). Insufficient criminal justice system response to the severity of domestic violence during the pandemic in Indonesia. Heliyon, 10(14), e33719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33719

Melchert, C. (1997). The formation of the Sunni schools of law, 9th–10th centuries C.E. Brill.

Merry, S. E. (1988). Legal pluralism. Law & Society Review, 22(5), 869–896. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053638

Mirdāwī, ʿA. al-Dīn ʿAlī ibn Sulaymān. (1955). Al-Inṣāf fī maʿrifat al-rājiḥ min al-khilāf (Vol. 8). Maṭbaʿat al-Sunnah al-Muḥammadiyyah.

Mir-Hosseini, Z. (2006). Muslim women’s quest for equality: Between Islamic law and feminism. Critical Inquiry, 32(4), 629–645. https://doi.org/10.1086/508085

Muslim ibn al-Ḥajjāj. (n.d.). Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim. Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī.

Mustamam, Danialsyah, Nurasiah Harahap, Mega Arum Saputri, dan Lutter Ariestino. “Reinterpreting Ḥifẓ Al-Nasl in Contemporary Marriage Contracts: Navigating Islamic Normativity and State Law.” MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review 4, no. 2 (2025): 1258–1280. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i2.11158

Nawawī, A. Z. Yaḥyā ibn Sharaf. (2005). Minhāj al-ṭālibīn wa ʿumdat al-muftīn (Vol. 7). Dār al-Fikr.

Nola, L. F. (2017). The urgency of applying domestic violence screening mechanism for divorce mediation in Religious Court. Mimbar Hukum, 29(3), 455–469. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.28713

Nurmila, N. (2025). KUPI approach to Qur’an and Hadith reinterpretation. African Journal of Gender and Religion, 31(1), 41–64.

Pound, R. (1910). Law in books and law in action. American Law Review, 44, 12–36.

Qurṭubī, A. ʿAbd Allāh M. ibn Aḥmad. (2006). Al-Jāmiʿ li-aḥkām al-Qurʾān (1st ed., Vol. 6). Muʾassasah al-Risālah.

Rāfiʿī, A. al-Qāsim K. al-Dīn ʿAbd al-Karīm ibn Muḥammad. (1997). Al-ʿAzīz sharḥ al-Wajīz (Vol. 8). Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah.

Rahman, F. (1980). Major themes of the Qur’an. University of Chicago Press.

Rahman, F. (1982). Islam and modernity: Transformation of an intellectual tradition. University of Chicago Press.

Saeed, A. (2006). Interpreting the Qur’an: Towards a contemporary approach. Routledge.

Saeed, A. (2014). Reading the Qur’an in the twenty-first century: A contextualist approach. Routledge.

Sarakhsi, S. al-Aʾimmah. (n.d.). Uṣūl al-Sarakhsī. Dār al-Maʿrifah.

Shāfiʿī, M. ibn Idrīs. (1940). Al-Risālah (A. M. Shākir, Ed.). Maktabat al-Ḥalabī.

Shāṭibī, A. I. (1997). Al-Muwāfaqāt fī uṣūl al-sharīʿah (ʿA. Allāh Darrāz, Ed.). Dār al-Maʿrifah.

Supraptiningsih, U., et al. (2026). Understanding the sexual violence reality: A review of community perspectives and legal aspects. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam, 10(1), 296–320. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v10i1.26707

Sukendar, S., et al. (2023). Women’s access to justice: Mediation for the victims of domestic violence in Central Java, Indonesia. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam, 7(1), 602–628. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i1.9471

Svensson, J. (2025). Allah says beat them! An analysis of non-Muslim Islams justifying domestic violence. In A. Ackfeldt & J. Petersen (Eds.), The production and consumption of non-Muslim Islams. Edinburgh University Press.

Ṭabarī, A. Jaʿfar M. ibn Jarīr. (2001). Jāmiʿ al-bayān ʿan taʾwīl āy al-Qurʾān (1st ed., Vol. 6). Markaz al-Buḥūth wa al-Dirāsāt al-ʿArabiyyah wa al-Islāmiyyah bi Dār Hajar.

Tamanaha, B. Z. (2001). A general jurisprudence of law and society. Oxford University Press.

Tirmidhī, M. ibn ʿĪsā. (n.d.). Sunan al-Tirmidhī. Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī.

Wadud, A. (1999). Qur’an and woman: Rereading the sacred text from a woman’s perspective (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Wahbah al-Zuḥaylī. (1985). Al-Fiqh al-Islāmī wa adillatuhu: Al-shāmil li al-adillah al-sharʿiyyah wa al-ārāʾ al-madhhabiyyah wa ahamm al-naẓariyyāt al-fiqhiyyah wa taḥqīq al-aḥādīth al-nabawiyyah wa takhrījihā (2nd ed., Vol. 7). Dār al-Fikr.

World Health Organization. (2025). Violence against women prevalence estimates, 2023: Global, regional and national prevalence estimates for intimate partner violence against women and non-partner sexual violence against women. United Nations. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240116962

Downloads

Published

2026-06-23

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Adly, Muhammad Amar, Ardiansyah Ardiansyah, Hasan Matsum, Fikfik Taufik, and Najib A. Gisymar. 2026. “Reinterpreting Ḍarb In Islamic Family Law: A Maqāṣid-Based Socio-Legal Approach”. Mawaddah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 4 (1): 743-80. https://doi.org/10.52496/mjhki.v4i1.89.